McCain Running on Empty
Sen. John McCain has a new ad out today on climate change. Check it out:
Sounds great right? John McCain doesn’t follow the President on climate change and wants to curb greenhouse gasses.
Not so fast.
From the New York Times’ Elisabeth Bumiller:
Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, is to provide an audience of Houston oil executives with more details of his proposal to lift the federal moratorium on offshore oil and gas exploration in states that want it. Mr. McCain’s position is welcome news for the oil industry, which has called for years for the ban to be lifted.
"With gasoline running at more than four bucks a gallon, many do not have the luxury of waiting on the far-off plans of futurists and politicians," Mr. McCain plans to say. "We have proven oil reserves of at least 21 billion barrels in the United States. But a broad federal moratorium stands in the way of energy exploration and production, and I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use." Mr. McCain first made public his position on the moratorium on Monday in Virginia.
Just so this is clear: On the same day that John McCain releases a new ad discussing his commitment to confronting climate change, he also proposes drilling for offshore oil and gas.
Politically, McCain may be seeking the energy security mantle, but he will have trouble claiming to care about climate at the same time, especially when it looks like he is just giving handouts to the oil industry. This move will not help in the short term as wells in these places will not come online tomorrow, and the amount of oil and natural gas extracted would not lower prices in any meaningful way.
Plus, offshore drilling is so unpopular in Florida, that even Jeb Bush opposed it as Governor. In fact, as First Read points out:
No Republicans in Florida have gotten elected statewide without endorsing the moratorium on off-shore oil drilling.
Between this drilling proposal and the gas tax holiday, it sounds like John McCain’s Straight Talk Express may be in bad need of a fill-up.
- Jake Berliner's blog
- Login or register to post comments














Comments
برامج مجانية تحميل برامج
برامج مجانية تحميل برامج iphone برامج ماسنجر برامج نوكيا
This is a waste of time,
<!--[if gte mso 9]>
Normal
0
<![endif]-->
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
h1
{mso-style-next:Normal;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
page-break-after:avoid;
mso-outline-level:1;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-font-kerning:0pt;}
p.MsoBodyText, li.MsoBodyText, div.MsoBodyText
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:blue;
font-weight:bold;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->This is a waste of time, McCain have no plans for a better
thing. Using such matters will just cause nothing but issues for him. his view
for climate change is quite ridiculous. He cannot convince people to work with
him for the fact that they don't even know what McCain is establishing. The
latest headlines are how Obama is turning them down for their requested bailout
money. He has refused further aid to
the ailing auto firms, after they were given large sums of money to keep them
afloat. He has, however, given them 60
days to come up with a better plan to come back to the forefront of the auto
industry. Otherwise,
it will be no more
payday loans for the ailing automakers.
In Contrast To Clinton's Plan
"Hillary has a bold and comprehensive plan to address America's energy and environmental challenges that will establish a green, efficient economy and create as many as five million new jobs.
Centered on a cap and trade system for carbon emissions, stronger energy and auto efficiency standards and a significant increase in green research funding, Hillary's plan will reduce America's reliance on foreign oil and address the looming climate crisis.
Setting ambitious targets, the plan would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050 to avoid the worst effects of global warming, and cut foreign oil imports by two-thirds from 2030 projected levels, more than 10 million barrels per day.
Hillary would transform our economy from carbon-based to clean and energy efficient, jumpstarting research and development through a $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund and doubling investment in basic energy research. She would also spur the green building industry by funding the retrofitting and modernization of 20 million low-income homes and take concrete steps to reduce electricity consumption, including enacting strict appliance efficiency standards and phasing out incandescent light bulbs.
Recognizing that transportation accounts for 70 percent of U.S. oil consumption, Hillary would increase fuel efficiency standards to 55 miles per gallon by 2030, but would help automakers retool their production facilities through $20 billion in "Green Vehicle Bonds."
To take the steps necessary to transition to a clean and renewable energy future, Hillary will urge all of the nation's stakeholders to contribute to the effort. Automakers will be asked to make more efficient vehicles; oil and energy companies to invest in cleaner, renewable technologies; utilities to ramp up use of renewables and modernize the grid; coal companies to implement clean coal technology; government to establish a cap and trade carbon emissions system and renew its leadership in energy efficient buildings and services; individuals to conserve energy and utilize efficient light bulbs and appliances in their homes; and industry to build energy efficient homes and buildings.
Hillary's plan to promote energy independence, address global warming, and transform our economy includes:
Source: http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/energy/
One of our current and still-running (albeit democrat SUSPENDED) candidates, Hillary Clinton, has actual practical plans to improve the environment.
I'm writing-in a vote for Hillary Clinton instead of Barack Obama this Fall.
Take back the Power of the People. I got swept in a wave of smooth speech and now I'm looking at resume's instead.
Lyin', Cheatin', Hurtin'...It's all he seems to do...
We have a qualified candidate, Hillary Clinton and we have a smooth-talking candidate, Barack Obama.
I learned today that in addition to not having much in the way of concrete plans like Hillary's to provide actual working solutions to foreign oil dependance and alternative energy, Obama did not represent "change" when he ran for office in Chicago Illinois.
He nosed out an elder and favored stateswoman in Chicago by hardball politics:
************
"The day after New Year's 1996, operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.
There they began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city's South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama's four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.
Fresh from his work as a civil rights lawyer and head of a voter registration project that expanded access to the ballot box, Obama launched his first campaign for the Illinois Senate saying he wanted to empower disenfranchised citizens.
But in that initial bid for political office, Obama quickly mastered the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics. His overwhelming legal onslaught signaled his impatience to gain office, even if that meant elbowing aside an elder stateswoman like Palmer."
A close examination of Obama's first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career: The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.
One of the candidates he eliminated, long-shot contender Gha-is Askia, now says that Obama's petition challenges belied his image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights.
"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia said. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"
Source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-070403obama-ballot,0,1843097.story
********
Barack Obama is a man who talks out of both sides of his mouth. He'll tell you what you want to hear, not give any specific details (like with energy policy) and then when backs are turned he employs the most ruthless of old-school politics...more ruthless than conservative neocons even. And guess who got him elected president of Harvard's (elite and priveledged) Law Review? Conservatives...
And where are all those funds coming from for his 4 to 1 outspending Hillary's older more established supporters? Now that the dust is settling around the great orator Barack Obama, it's time to see what lies underneath it all.
It feels like a bad relationship. He is cute, smooth talking and got me to put my vote behind him. Now I find out he's just like all the other guys and even worse, he's attacked and strong-armed a woman and another minority from even having a chance at running against him. Outspending Hillary 4 to 1 feels like Chicago dirty politics all over again.
Who is funding this guy? Who...?